New images from inside the Great Pyramid shaft reveal evidence of electrical terminals, cables and even ancient wiring diagrams !
The discovery of electrical contacts and wiring inside the Great Pyramid, along with markings that show how to connect them, do not fit anywhere in conventional Egyptology but confirm the theory first published in The book, The Giza Power Plant: Technologies of Ancient Egypt in 1998.
The Great Pyramid has long been a source of mystery for the world. Specialists and lay people alike have been drawn to what it might tell us about our ancient past, with a variety of theories being offered for consideration. While there are over a hundred pyramids in Egypt, the majority of them, while important and significant themselves, seem all to be cast in the shadow of the Great.
What is it about this pyramid that makes it so GREAT ?
Going back as far as the 17 century, there are accounts of numerous explorations into the Great Pyramid that have yielded significant new details of the structure. In more recent times, a flurry of excitement has surrounded the mystery of a small shaft discovered in 1872 in the wall of the Queen’s Chamber.
This shaft did not connect to the chamber and was discovered after a rod was pushed into a small crack in the wall and, after meeting no resistance, prompted Waynman Dixon, a British explorer, to have the limestone chiseled away revealing a square opening that measured 20.32 cm (8.00 in) wide and 22.35 cm (8.8 in) high. A similar shaft was subsequently found in the north wall.
In 1993, a German robotics engineer Rudolph Gantenbrink, on contract to install ventilation fans in the King’s Chamber shafts after cleaning the debris using a robot, proposed that he use his robot, named “Upuaut II”, meaning “opener of the ways”, to explore the Southern Shaft in the Queen’s Chamber to coax from the depths of pyramid more of its secrets. While the exits from the shafts from the King’s Chamber are found on the outside of the pyramid, no exit has ever been found for either of the Queen’s Chamber shafts.
Because of the machine like technical appearance of the Great Pyramid and the precision with which it was built, in 1977, I began developing a theory that the original function of the Great Pyramid was not a tomb but a power plant. Within the context of the power plant, all its attributes and anomalous features that other theories were unable to explain without resorting to symbolism, found a practical answer.
The Queen’s Chamber, served as a reaction chamber and the shafts leading to this chamber supplied two chemicals that when mixed together created hydrogen.In 1993 an exploration by Gantenbrink and when Upuaut II came to the end of the shaft, what is now famously known as Gantenbrink’s “door” came into view with two metal pins attached.
Jeff Summer, immediately claimed that they looked like electrodes. This made sense for in order to maintain the head pressure in the shafts, they had to be kept full and the electrodes would serve as a switch to signal replenishment. In 1998,the book, The Giza Power Plant, was published incorporating this theory.
Then in 2002, to much fanfare and excitement, “Opening of the Lost Tomb”, which offered to show live the exploration of the Queen’s Chamber southern shaft drilled through the limestone block with the metal fittings and then insert a camera through the hole to see what was behind it. Broadcast in Europe by National Geographic and in the US by Fox Television the documentary capture 30 million viewers in the US alone.
Since the publication of the book and prior to the broadcast three posted articles explaining the reasoning behind analysis of these shafts and what would be revealed if we were able to look behind it. Based on what was wrote in The Giza Power Plant, the last article outlined a prediction of what would be found behind the block. The prediction included a drawing of the continuation of the metal fittings, or wiring attached to them, and a chemical supply shaft for the delivery of the chemical.
The results were not conclusive, but parts of the theory were supported particularly the thickness of the block. However, what has recently been revealed shows that my design was not quite correct. The ancient Egyptians’ design was much better and provided greater evidence to support this theory
In an article published on May 25, 2011 in New Scientist Online magazine, the latest exploration of the Southern Shaft in the Great Pyramid’s Queen’s Chamber provides new information that answers the question of what the back of this block looks like.
A new robot has been sent up this shaft and had taken more images behind a stone block. (The shaft due to its small size could only allow a small animal to pass and Gantenbrink does not call the block a “door” as it has been name by Egyptologists, but a USO, or Unidentified Stone Object a nomenclature that I will adopt for purposes of this article.)
It was astonishing that information regarding this long awaited exploration had been released without fanfare Zahi Hawass, the minister of antiquities in Egypt, and director of this recent expedition, described these internal features as the “last great mystery of the Great Pyramid.” With the last exploration broadcast on Fox television in the US garnering 30 million viewers, why was National Geographic or Fox television not involved?
Reading the article and looking at the grainy images of the back of the stone block with the metal fittings first detected by Gantenbrink’s robot, it became clear that the author and expedition team members were aware of the power plant theory. Rowan Hooper writes, “Metal is not part of any other known structure in the pyramid, and the discovery ignited speculation that the pins were door handles, keys or even parts of a power supply constructed by aliens.” Unfortunately, comments like these are not helpful.
As the first person to publish a work that described the pins as electrical devices, the discovery of the pins in 1993 was not the trigger that gave birth to the idea that the Great Pyramid was a power plant they simply enhanced the proposed use that had been formulated in 1977 for the Queen’s Chamber and the shafts.
Read More here: http://www.gizapower.com/Anotherrobot.htm